Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 89
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 85
- Top scholars
- Frédéric AmantGemma G. KenterEkaterina S. JordanovaCarien L. CreutzbergMansoor Raza MirzaMartin KoskasWillemien J. van DrielTanja D. de Gruijl
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (41 papers)International Journal of Gynecological Cancer (35 papers)Cancers (15 papers)European Journal of Cancer (13 papers)Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumItaly
In The Last Decade
Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam
359 papers receiving 13.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 3.4k
- Reproductive Medicine 2k
- Oncology 2.6k
- Cancer Research 692
- Immunology 933
Countries citing scholars working at Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam at the time of their publication.
About Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam have published 380 papers, which have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 97 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 85 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 68 papers in Oncology, 2 papers in Biological Psychiatry and 47 papers in Epidemiology on the topics of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (89 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (85 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (45 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (33 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (18 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (14 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (12 papers) and Family Support in Illness (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Obstetrics and Gynecology (3.4k citations), Reproductive Medicine (2k citations), Oncology (2.6k citations), Cancer Research (692 citations) and Immunology (933 citations). Authors at Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, Belgium and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cancers, European Journal of Cancer and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Some of Centrum voor Gynaecologische Oncologie Amsterdam's most productive authors include Frédéric Amant, Gemma G. Kenter, Ekaterina S. Jordanova, Carien L. Creutzberg, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Martin Koskas, Willemien J. van Driel, Tanja D. de Gruijl, Christianne A. R. Lok and Luc R.C.W. van Lonkhuijzen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.