CERMICS

36.4k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

CERMICS

1.2k papers receiving 35.7k citations

Peers

CERMICS
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Numerical Analysis 2.4k
  • Computational Mechanics 8.7k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 3.7k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 5.0k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 3.2k
Replace Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique with:
Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique France
Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure France
Service de Physique de l'État Condensé France
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de la Matière Condensée France
Centre de Physique Théorique France
Institut für Technische und Angewandte Physik (Germany) Germany
Institut Fourier France
Laboratoire Paul Painlevé France
Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées France
Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Physique Théorique France
CERMICS relative to Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique France Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.6×
Laboratoire d'Informatique de l'École Polytechnique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at CERMICS

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at CERMICS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at CERMICS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CERMICS more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at CERMICS

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with CERMICS at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with CERMICS at the time of their publication.

About CERMICS

In recent decades, authors affiliated with CERMICS have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 36.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 191 papers in Mathematical Physics, 318 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 383 papers in Computational Mechanics, 193 papers in Applied Mathematics and 93 papers in Numerical Analysis on the topics of Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (251 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (239 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (123 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (115 papers), Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (89 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (75 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (73 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (62 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Numerical Analysis (2.4k citations), Computational Mechanics (8.7k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (3.7k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (5.0k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (3.2k citations). Authors at CERMICS collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Comptes Rendus Mathématique, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Computational Physics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering and SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. Some of CERMICS's most productive authors include Benedetta Mennucci, J. Tomasi, Éric Cancès, Alexandre Ern, Éric Cancès, Claude Le Bris, Daniele A. Di Pietro, Tony Lelièvre, Serge Piperno and Aurélien Alfonsi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact