Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques

2.9k citations
308 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques

221 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
  • Literature and Literary Theory 302
  • Accounting 125
  • Communication 87
  • Sociology and Political Science 406
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 33
Replace Institut Marcel Mauss with:
Institut Marcel Mauss France
Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne France
Routledge (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Fondation Maison des Sciences de l'Homme France
Groupe de Recherche sur la Socialisation France
médialab Sciences Po France
Institut d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine France
Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale France
Centre de gestion en recherche France
National Foundation for Educational Research United Kingdom
Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques relative to Institut Marcel Mauss France Institut Marcel Mauss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Institut Marcel Mauss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques at the time of their publication.

About Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques have published 308 papers, which have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 110 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 48 papers in Language and Linguistics, 52 papers in Philosophy, 3 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and 24 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts on the topics of Semiotics and Representation Studies (88 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (37 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (19 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (12 papers), French Language Learning Methods (9 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (9 papers) and Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Literature and Literary Theory (302 citations), Accounting (125 citations), Communication (87 citations), Sociology and Political Science (406 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (33 citations). Authors at Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques collaborate with scholars in France, Belgium and Luxembourg and have published in prestigious journals including Semiotica, Sign Systems Studies, British Journal of Educational Psychology, First Language and Languages. Some of Centre de Recherches Sémiotiques's most productive authors include Petra Pelletier, Jacques Fontanille, Philippe Thomas, Algirdas Julien Greimas, Cyril Hazif‐Thomas, Claude Zilberberg, Nicolás Roche, Thierry Chinet, Pascal Chanez and Alain P. Didier.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact