Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria

9.9k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria

1.0k papers receiving 9.4k citations

Peers

Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Horticulture 630
  • Insect Science 1.8k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 1.5k
  • Plant Science 3.9k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.0k
Replace Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas with:
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas Cuba
Fort Valley State University United States
Instituto Tecnológico de Mérida Mexico
Agricultural University of Havana Cuba
Instituto de Investigaciones Avícolas Cuba
University of Matanzas Cuba
National Agrarian University Nicaragua
Zamorano Pan-American Agricultural School Honduras
Mississippi Delta Community College United States
Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory United States
Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria relative to Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas Cuba Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria at the time of their publication.

About Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 60 papers in Horticulture, 227 papers in Insect Science, 153 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 125 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 88 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Plant and soil sciences (125 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (105 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (94 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (83 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (77 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (74 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (69 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (67 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (630 citations), Insect Science (1.8k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (1.5k citations), Plant Science (3.9k citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (1.0k citations). Authors at Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria collaborate with scholars in Cuba, Spain and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Plant Pathology, Plant Disease, Pathogens, Archives of Virology and Veterinary Microbiology. Some of Centro Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria's most productive authors include Elvira Fiallo‐Olivé, Jesús Navas‐Castillo, Sonia Sánchez‐Campos, Lester J. Pérez, Llilianne Ganges, Maria Teresa Frı́as, Y. Arocha, Heidy Dı́az de Arce, Yamila Martínez and Carmen Laura Perera.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact