Centre Émile Durkheim
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Social Sciences and Governance
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
- European Union Policy and Governance
Papers in
- Urban Studies 135
- Social Sciences and Governance 131
-
- Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender 156
- European Union Policy and Governance 39
- Top scholars
- Andy SmithDaniel C. BachOlivier CostaCamille BedockGilles PinsonAnaïs ThéviotEmmanuel LangloisSylvain Brouard
- Journals
- Revue française de science politique (22 papers)French Politics (18 papers)Sociologie du Travail (11 papers)Critical Policy Studies (8 papers)Journal of Legislative Studies (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Centre Émile Durkheim
704 papers receiving 4.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
- Urban Studies 542
- Political Science and International Relations 1.5k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.4k
- Communication 240
- Public Administration 106
Countries citing scholars working at Centre Émile Durkheim
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre Émile Durkheim. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre Émile Durkheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre Émile Durkheim more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre Émile Durkheim
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre Émile Durkheim at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre Émile Durkheim at the time of their publication.
About Centre Émile Durkheim
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre Émile Durkheim have published 936 papers, which have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 135 papers in Urban Studies, 320 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 539 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 137 papers in General Health Professions and 20 papers in History and Philosophy of Science on the topics of Education, sociology, and vocational training (224 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (215 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (156 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (131 papers), Social Policies and Family (92 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (89 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (39 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Urban Studies (542 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.5k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.4k citations), Communication (240 citations) and Public Administration (106 citations). Authors at Centre Émile Durkheim collaborate with scholars in France, Germany and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Revue française de science politique, French Politics, Sociologie du Travail, Critical Policy Studies and Journal of Legislative Studies. Some of Centre Émile Durkheim's most productive authors include Andy Smith, Daniel C. Bach, Olivier Costa, Camille Bedock, Gilles Pinson, Anaïs Théviot, Emmanuel Langlois, Sylvain Brouard, Isabelle Guinaudeau and Éric Kerrouche.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.