Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 49
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 99
- Top scholars
- Frédéric MèdailKatia DiademaBouchaïb KhadariSébastien LavergneWilfried ThuillerBruno ColasJérémie Van EsMiquel Riba
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (9 papers)Journal of Bryology (8 papers)PLoS ONE (8 papers)Journal for Nature Conservation (6 papers)Biodiversity and Conservation (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandItaly
In The Last Decade
Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles
288 papers receiving 7.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Ecological Modeling 1.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.7k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.1k
- Plant Science 3.1k
- Ecology 2.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles at the time of their publication.
About Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles have published 317 papers, which have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 49 papers in Ecological Modeling, 104 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 149 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 25 papers in Forestry and 138 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (99 papers), Plant and animal studies (93 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (49 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (45 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (36 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (36 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (27 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.7k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.1k citations), Plant Science (3.1k citations) and Ecology (2.1k citations). Authors at Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles collaborate with scholars in France, Switzerland and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, Journal of Bryology, PLoS ONE, Journal for Nature Conservation and Biodiversity and Conservation. Some of Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles's most productive authors include Frédéric Mèdail, Katia Diadema, Bouchaïb Khadari, Sébastien Lavergne, Wilfried Thuiller, Bruno Colas, Jérémie Van Es, Miquel Riba, Bernard Pasquier and Luc Garraud.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.