Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 155
-
- Plant and animal studies 172
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 109
- Top scholars
- Craig C. MoritzJeremy J. BurdonPeter H. ThrallRalph Mac NallyJoseph T. MillerAnthony H. D. BrownA. Malcolm GillAndrew G. Young
- Journals
- Australian Systematic Botany (26 papers)Taxon (23 papers)Molecular Ecology (20 papers)Australian Journal of Botany (20 papers)PLoS ONE (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research
961 papers receiving 34.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
- Ecological Modeling 5.8k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 10.5k
- Ecology 9.3k
- Paleontology 2.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research at the time of their publication.
About Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 35.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 155 papers in Ecological Modeling, 357 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 205 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 85 papers in Paleontology and 54 papers in Geography, Planning and Development on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (173 papers), Plant and animal studies (172 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (155 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (113 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (109 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (87 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (66 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (59 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (5.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (10.5k citations), Ecology (9.3k citations) and Paleontology (2.4k citations). Authors at Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Systematic Botany, Taxon, Molecular Ecology, Australian Journal of Botany and PLoS ONE. Some of Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research's most productive authors include Craig C. Moritz, Jeremy J. Burdon, Peter H. Thrall, Ralph Mac Nally, Joseph T. Miller, Anthony H. D. Brown, A. Malcolm Gill, Andrew G. Young, Rosa Agudo and Dan F. Rosauer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.