University of Cambridge
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.05%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Molecular Biology top 0.05%
- Protein Structure and Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 5.1k
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3.3k
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2.9k
- Structural Biology 1.2k
- Top scholars
- Stephen William HawkingTrevor William RobbinsM. Hashem PesaranJohn RobertsonAndrea Carlo FerrariN. F. MottMichael John BerridgeSimon Baron‐Cohen
- Journals
- Nature (4.9k papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (4.7k papers)The Astrophysical Journal (2k papers)Nature Communications (2k papers)PLoS ONE (1.9k papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
University of Cambridge
294.5k papers receiving 15.6M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 939.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.8M
- Cognitive Neuroscience 542.9k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 365.3k
- Genetics 618.4k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Cambridge
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Cambridge. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Cambridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Cambridge more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Cambridge
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Cambridge at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Cambridge at the time of their publication.
About University of Cambridge
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Cambridge have published 308.5k papers, which have received a total of 15.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16.8k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.2k papers in Structural Biology, 8.9k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 26.9k papers in Molecular Biology and 5k papers in Condensed Matter Physics on the topics of Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (5.1k papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3.3k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2.9k papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (2.7k papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2.4k papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2.3k papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2.3k papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2.2k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (939.4k citations), Molecular Biology (1.8M citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (542.9k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (365.3k citations) and Genetics (618.4k citations). Authors at University of Cambridge collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nature, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE. Some of University of Cambridge's most productive authors include Stephen William Hawking, Trevor William Robbins, M. Hashem Pesaran, John Robertson, Andrea Carlo Ferrari, N. F. Mott, Michael John Berridge, Simon Baron‐Cohen, George Keith Batchelor and Richard Henry Friend.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.