Bombay Natural History Society

7.2k citations
367 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Bombay Natural History Society

335 papers receiving 7.2k citations

Peers

Bombay Natural History Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Ecology 2.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 258
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 858
  • Parasitology 405
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
Replace Salim Ali Center for Ornithology and Natural History with:
Salim Ali Center for Ornithology and Natural History India
Wildlife Conservation Society India India
WWF-India India
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Oman
Environment Agency Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research India
The University Of Agriculture Dera Ismail Khan Pakistan
Center for Advanced Studies in Agriculture and Food Security Pakistan
National Trust for Nature Conservation Nepal
National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management India
Bombay Natural History Society relative to Salim Ali Center for Ornithology and Natural History India Salim Ali Center for Ornithology and Natural History's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.5×
Salim Ali Center for Ornithology and Natural History · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Bombay Natural History Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bombay Natural History Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bombay Natural History Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bombay Natural History Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Bombay Natural History Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bombay Natural History Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bombay Natural History Society at the time of their publication.

About Bombay Natural History Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bombay Natural History Society have published 367 papers, which have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 148 papers in Ecology, 10 papers in Ecological Modeling, 81 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 26 papers in Aquatic Science and 39 papers in Oceanography on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (88 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (70 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (55 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (33 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (28 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (20 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (20 papers) and Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (2.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (258 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (858 citations), Parasitology (405 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations). Authors at Bombay Natural History Society collaborate with scholars in India, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, ZooKeys, Bird Conservation International, Biological Conservation and PLoS ONE. Some of Bombay Natural History Society's most productive authors include Asad R. Rahmani, Deborah J. Pain, Rhys E. Green, VIBHU M. PRAKASH, Andrew A. Cunningham, Varad B. Giri, Richard Cuthbert, Deepak Arun Apte, Mark A. Taggart and Susanne Shultz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact