Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy

8.4k citations
498 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy

444 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Oceanography 4.1k
  • Aerospace Engineering 4.0k
  • Geophysics 1.8k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.1k
  • Ocean Engineering 829
Replace Planet with:
Planet Germany
Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography Czechia
Center for MathematicaL studies and their Applications France
Ecolab (France) France
Remote Sensing Solutions (Germany) Germany
SpaceTech (Germany) Germany
Danish Geodata Agency Denmark
Cineca Italy
Swissmedic Switzerland
Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand France
Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy relative to Planet Germany Planet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Planet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy at the time of their publication.

About Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy have published 498 papers, which have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 267 papers in Oceanography, 239 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 99 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 34 papers in Geography, Planning and Development and 58 papers in Geophysics on the topics of Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (265 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (215 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (69 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (50 papers), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (47 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (37 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (37 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (4.1k citations), Aerospace Engineering (4.0k citations), Geophysics (1.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.1k citations) and Ocean Engineering (829 citations). Authors at Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Geodesy, Journal of Geodynamics, Advances in Space Research, Geophysical Journal International and GPS Solutions. Some of Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy's most productive authors include Hartmut Wziontek, Torben Schüler, Ulrich Schreiber, Thomas Klügel, Bernd Richter, Wolfgang Schlüter, Oliver Montenbruck, Peter Steigenberger, Johannes Ihde and Bernd Eissfeller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact