Biola University

14.5k citations
859 papers ·

Impact in

  • Health top 5%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
    • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Papers in

  • Health 214
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 205
    • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education 94
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 48
    • Christian Theology and Mission 42

Biola University

748 papers receiving 14.5k citations

Peers

Biola University
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
  • Health 4.4k
  • Social Psychology 2.5k
  • Religious studies 752
  • Clinical Psychology 1.5k
  • Demography 468
Replace Fuller Theological Seminary with:
Fuller Theological Seminary United States
University of Redlands United States
Westmont College United States
Saybrook University United States
Pitzer College United States
Fielding Graduate University United States
University of La Verne United States
Mills College United States
California Institute of Integral Studies United States
Scripps College United States
Biola University relative to Fuller Theological Seminary United States Fuller Theological Seminary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fuller Theological Seminary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Biola University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Biola University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Biola University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biola University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Biola University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Biola University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Biola University at the time of their publication.

About Biola University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Biola University have published 859 papers, which have received a total of 14.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 214 papers in Health, 177 papers in Religious studies, 104 papers in Philosophy, 96 papers in Social Psychology and 46 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology on the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (205 papers), Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education (94 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (48 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (42 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (36 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (33 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (27 papers) and Study and Philosophy of Religion (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (4.4k citations), Social Psychology (2.5k citations), Religious studies (752 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.5k citations) and Demography (468 citations). Authors at Biola University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Israel and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Psychology and Theology, Christian Education Journal Research on Educational Ministry, The Journal of Positive Psychology, Christian Higher Education and Religions. Some of Biola University's most productive authors include Peter C. Hill, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Todd W. Hall, Keith J. Edwards, M. Elizabeth Lewis Hall, James D. Guy, Robert E. Larzelere, John Briere, Diana M. Elliott and Julie Juola Exline.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact