Berliner Hochschule für Technik

39.9k citations
2.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Berliner Hochschule für Technik

2k papers receiving 39.9k citations

Peers

Berliner Hochschule für Technik
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Modeling and Simulation 3k
  • Pollution 1.7k
  • Computer Science Applications 792
  • Health Informatics 297
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1.9k
Replace Bauhaus-Universität Weimar with:
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar Germany
Fondazione Bruno Kessler Italy
University of Hradec Králové Czechia
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH Austria
West University of Timişoara Romania
University of Ostrava Czechia
Université d'Évry Val-d'Essonne France
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland Switzerland
University of Oradea Romania
HAW Hamburg Germany
Berliner Hochschule für Technik relative to Bauhaus-Universität Weimar Germany Bauhaus-Universität Weimar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Berliner Hochschule für Technik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Berliner Hochschule für Technik. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Berliner Hochschule für Technik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berliner Hochschule für Technik more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Berliner Hochschule für Technik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Berliner Hochschule für Technik at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Berliner Hochschule für Technik at the time of their publication.

About Berliner Hochschule für Technik

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Berliner Hochschule für Technik have published 2.2k papers, which have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 91 papers in Modeling and Simulation, 41 papers in Computer Science Applications, 56 papers in Radiation, 46 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 31 papers in Occupational Therapy on the topics of Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (78 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (53 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (39 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (32 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (31 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (31 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (29 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Modeling and Simulation (3k citations), Pollution (1.7k citations), Computer Science Applications (792 citations), Health Informatics (297 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (1.9k citations). Authors at Berliner Hochschule für Technik collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Electrochimica Acta, Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Chemie Ingenieur Technik and Reproductive Toxicology. Some of Berliner Hochschule für Technik's most productive authors include Helmut Vogt, Ulrike Grömping, Yuri Luchko, Yury F. Luchko, Elisabeth Grohmann, Martin Ochmann, Herbert Stahl, Ina Koch, Agathe Merceron and Volker Quaschning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact