University of Bern

3.7M citations
95.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research 2.9k
    • Cryospheric studies and observations 1.0k
    • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes 1.1k

University of Bern

83.8k papers receiving 3.3M citations

Peers

University of Bern
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Oral Surgery 95.0k
  • Atmospheric Science 254.3k
  • Orthodontics 43.9k
  • Periodontics 39.4k
  • Global and Planetary Change 184.6k
Replace University of Zurich with:
University of Zurich Switzerland
KU Leuven Belgium
University of Milan Italy
University of Geneva Switzerland
Heidelberg University Germany
University of Freiburg Germany
Université Paris Cité France
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Germany
University of Amsterdam Netherlands
University of Bologna Italy
University of Bern relative to University of Zurich Switzerland University of Zurich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
University of Zurich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Bern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Bern. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Bern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Bern more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Bern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Bern at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Bern at the time of their publication.

About University of Bern

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Bern have published 95.6k papers, which have received a total of 3.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.3k papers in Atmospheric Science, 1.8k papers in Oral Surgery, 437 papers in Equine, 1.0k papers in Orthodontics and 1.5k papers in Small Animals on the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2.9k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (1.9k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.3k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.3k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.2k papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (1.1k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.1k papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (1.0k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oral Surgery (95.0k citations), Atmospheric Science (254.3k citations), Orthodontics (43.9k citations), Periodontics (39.4k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (184.6k citations). Authors at University of Bern collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Clinical Oral Implants Research and Astronomy and Astrophysics. Some of University of Bern's most productive authors include Matthias Egger, Laurent Excoffier, Peter Christian Gøtzsche, Douglas G. Altman, Jan Paul Vandenbroucke, Erik B von Elm, Stuart Pocock, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider and Marco Baggiolini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact