German Medical Association

7.5k citations
398 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

German Medical Association

345 papers receiving 7.0k citations

Peers

German Medical Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.4k
  • Biological Psychiatry 176
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 757
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 533
  • General Health Professions 868
Replace National Board of Health with:
National Board of Health Denmark
Augenstern Germany
Metropolitan University College Denmark
Kungälvs Sjukhus Sweden
Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH Austria
University College Lillebaelt Denmark
IFT Institut für Therapieforschung Germany
Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer Germany
Södertälje Sjukhus Sweden
Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Germany
German Medical Association relative to National Board of Health Denmark National Board of Health's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
National Board of Health · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at German Medical Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at German Medical Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at German Medical Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites German Medical Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at German Medical Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with German Medical Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with German Medical Association at the time of their publication.

About German Medical Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with German Medical Association have published 398 papers, which have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 121 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 101 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Medical Terminology and 7 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Health and Medical Studies (49 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (47 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (35 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (21 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (18 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (1.4k citations), Biological Psychiatry (176 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (757 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (533 citations) and General Health Professions (868 citations). Authors at German Medical Association collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMC Medical Education, International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, Pharmacopsychiatry and BMC Health Services Research. Some of German Medical Association's most productive authors include B. Müller‐Oerlinghausen, Heiner K. Berthold, Armin Zittermann, Ramin W Parsa-Parsi, Gero Tenderich, Peter Stehle, Stefanie Schulze Schleithoff, Reiner Koerfer, Ulrich T. Hinderer and Ute Lewitzka.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact