Minnesota Epilepsy Group
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Epilepsy research and treatment
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
-
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Papers in
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 205
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 22
-
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies 118
- Pharmaceutical studies and practices 15
- Top scholars
- Ilo E. LeppikJohn R. GatesGail L. RisseJames C. CloydPatricia E. PenovichMichael FrostBarry A. FranklinThaddeus S. Walczak
- Journals
- Epilepsia (73 papers)Epilepsy & Behavior (40 papers)Neurology (31 papers)Epilepsy Research (22 papers)Journal of Child Neurology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Minnesota Epilepsy Group
361 papers receiving 15.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
- Psychiatry and Mental health 8.5k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 4.8k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.6k
- Physiology 2.5k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.0k
Countries citing scholars working at Minnesota Epilepsy Group
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Minnesota Epilepsy Group. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Minnesota Epilepsy Group with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minnesota Epilepsy Group more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Minnesota Epilepsy Group
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Minnesota Epilepsy Group at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Minnesota Epilepsy Group at the time of their publication.
About Minnesota Epilepsy Group
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Minnesota Epilepsy Group have published 408 papers, which have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 227 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 136 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 56 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and 45 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Epilepsy research and treatment (205 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (118 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (39 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (27 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (23 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (16 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (8.5k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (4.8k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.6k citations), Physiology (2.5k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (2.0k citations). Authors at Minnesota Epilepsy Group collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and France and have published in prestigious journals including Epilepsia, Epilepsy & Behavior, Neurology, Epilepsy Research and Journal of Child Neurology. Some of Minnesota Epilepsy Group's most productive authors include Ilo E. Leppik, John R. Gates, Gail L. Risse, James C. Cloyd, Patricia E. Penovich, Michael Frost, Barry A. Franklin, Thaddeus S. Walczak, Robert J. Gumnit and J. R. Gates.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.