Arizona Geological Survey

61.9k citations
1.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Arizona Geological Survey

1.4k papers receiving 60.3k citations

Peers

Arizona Geological Survey
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Ecological Modeling 3.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 18.9k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.6k
  • Ecology 16.2k
  • Water Science and Technology 8.5k
Replace Astrogeology Science Center with:
Astrogeology Science Center United States
NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory United States
Tetra Tech (United States) United States
Ocean Institute United States
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute United States
Moss Landing Marine Laboratories United States
Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area United States
National Water Research Institute United States
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research United States
Statewide California Earthquake Center United States
Arizona Geological Survey relative to Astrogeology Science Center United States Astrogeology Science Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Astrogeology Science Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Arizona Geological Survey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Arizona Geological Survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Arizona Geological Survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arizona Geological Survey more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Arizona Geological Survey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Arizona Geological Survey at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Arizona Geological Survey at the time of their publication.

About Arizona Geological Survey

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Arizona Geological Survey have published 1.5k papers, which have received a total of 61.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 84 papers in Ecological Modeling, 195 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 208 papers in Geophysics, 399 papers in Ecology and 331 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (161 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (140 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (133 papers), Landslides and related hazards (122 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (115 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (112 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (108 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (104 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (3.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (18.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.6k citations), Ecology (16.2k citations) and Water Science and Technology (8.5k citations). Authors at Arizona Geological Survey collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Geology, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Geological Society of America Bulletin, Ground Water and Science. Some of Arizona Geological Survey's most productive authors include Julio L. Betancourt, Pinnaduwa H.S.W. Kulatilake, Thomas W. Swetnam, Pamela L. Nagler, John M. Kemeny, Waite R. Osterkamp, Edward P. Glenn, Jon E. Spencer, Satya Harpalani and Stephen T. Jackson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact