Czech Academy of Sciences

944.1k citations
38.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Czech Academy of Sciences

36.1k papers receiving 907.2k citations

Peers

Czech Academy of Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 48.8k
  • Molecular Biology 227.3k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 63.4k
  • Ecological Modeling 12.8k
  • Insect Science 33.8k
Replace Charles University with:
Charles University Czechia
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Germany
Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany
University of Bayreuth Germany
Freie Universität Berlin Germany
Leipzig University Germany
University of Potsdam Germany
University of Regensburg Germany
Universität Innsbruck Austria
Czech Academy of Sciences relative to Charles University Czechia Charles University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Charles University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Czech Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Czech Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Czech Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Czech Academy of Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Czech Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Czech Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Czech Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Czech Academy of Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Czech Academy of Sciences have published 38.4k papers, which have received a total of 944.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8.6k papers in Molecular Biology, 2.4k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 2.1k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 1.4k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 5.1k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Plant and animal studies (963 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (924 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (920 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (720 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (593 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (562 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (540 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (539 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (48.8k citations), Molecular Biology (227.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (63.4k citations), Ecological Modeling (12.8k citations) and Insect Science (33.8k citations). Authors at Czech Academy of Sciences collaborate with scholars in Czechia, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physiological Research, Biologia Plantarum, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and physica status solidi (b). Some of Czech Academy of Sciences's most productive authors include Petr Pyšek, Pavel Hobza, J. Tauc, A. Vancu, R. Grigorovici, Jiřı́ Šponer, Vladimı́r Křen, Jan Bureš, David M. Richardson and Jiřı́ Homola.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact