Asia University

14.8k papers receiving 355.6k citations

Peers

Asia University
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 9k
  • Cancer Research 10.3k
  • Health Informatics 1.6k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 5.6k
  • Oncology 14.7k
Replace National Chung Hsing University with:
National Chung Hsing University Taiwan
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taiwan
China Medical University Hospital Taiwan
Fu Jen Catholic University Taiwan
National Sun Yat-sen University Taiwan
China Medical University Taiwan
Shenzhen University China
University of Macau Macao
Nanchang University China
Ningbo University China
Asia University relative to National Chung Hsing University Taiwan National Chung Hsing University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
National Chung Hsing University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Asia University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Asia University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Asia University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Asia University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Asia University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Asia University at the time of their publication.

About Asia University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Asia University have published 15.9k papers, which have received a total of 355.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 392 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 436 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 283 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 438 papers in Cancer Research and 650 papers in Computer Networks and Communications on the topics of Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (372 papers), Advanced Authentication Protocols Security (203 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (196 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (177 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (170 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (155 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (146 papers) and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (145 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Complementary and alternative medicine (9k citations), Cancer Research (10.3k citations), Health Informatics (1.6k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (5.6k citations) and Oncology (14.7k citations). Authors at Asia University collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Environmental Toxicology. Some of Asia University's most productive authors include Ming‐Lang Tseng, Yuh‐Shan Ho, Neeraj Kumar, U Rajendra Acharya, Calvin Yu‐Chian Chen, Brij Bhooshan Gupta, İlhan Öztürk, Mien‐Chie Hung, Chih‐Yang Huang and Thabet Abdeljawad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact