Orano (United States)

1.1k papers receiving 19.6k citations

Peers

Orano (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Metals and Alloys 815
  • Control and Systems Engineering 3.5k
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 5.0k
  • Aerospace Engineering 2.7k
Replace Alstom (United States) with:
Alstom (United States) United States
Naval Sea Systems Command United States
Federal Aviation Administration United States
Hatch (Canada) Canada
Arthur D. Little (United States) United States
Analytical Services United States
Pratt & Whitney (United States) United States
Impact Technology Development (United States) United States
Goodyear (United States) United States
PPG Industries (United States) United States
Orano (United States) relative to Alstom (United States) United States Alstom (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Alstom (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Orano (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Orano (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Orano (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orano (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Orano (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Orano (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Orano (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Orano (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Orano (United States) have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 20.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 52 papers in Metals and Alloys, 130 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 248 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 222 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 371 papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Nuclear Materials and Properties (227 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (183 papers), Power Systems Fault Detection (99 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (96 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (76 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (70 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (67 papers) and Power System Optimization and Stability (59 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Metals and Alloys (815 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (3.5k citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (5.0k citations) and Aerospace Engineering (2.7k citations). Authors at Orano (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, France and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Engineering and Design, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Technology, Journal of ASTM International and IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. Some of Orano (United States)'s most productive authors include Liangzhong Yao, Lie Xu, Yannick D’Escatha, Patrick Ledermann, F. Mudry, J.C. Devaux, André Pineau, Kwok Wai Cheung, Xinghuo Yu and Kevin L. Tomsovic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact