Federal Aviation Administration
Impact in
-
- Fire dynamics and safety research
Papers in
-
- Air Traffic Management and Optimization 504
- Aerospace and Aviation Technology 194
-
- Risk and Safety Analysis 154
- Top scholars
- Richard E. LyonRichard N. WaltersStanislav I. StoliarovDavid E. MeyerJeffrey E. EvansJoshua S. RubinsteinD. W. OplingerAlvin M. Revzin
- Journals
- SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series (55 papers)Journal of Aircraft (33 papers)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (24 papers)NAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation (20 papers)Proceedings of the IEEE (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Federal Aviation Administration
1.7k papers receiving 28.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 3.2k
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering 146
- Polymers and Plastics 3.9k
- Aerospace Engineering 5.7k
- Social Psychology 3.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Aviation Administration
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Aviation Administration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Aviation Administration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Aviation Administration more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Aviation Administration
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Aviation Administration at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Aviation Administration at the time of their publication.
About Federal Aviation Administration
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Aviation Administration have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 30.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 792 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 178 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 222 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 152 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 77 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology on the topics of Air Traffic Management and Optimization (504 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (222 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (194 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (154 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (151 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (77 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (77 papers) and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (77 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (3.2k citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (146 citations), Polymers and Plastics (3.9k citations), Aerospace Engineering (5.7k citations) and Social Psychology (3.1k citations). Authors at Federal Aviation Administration collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Aircraft, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, NAVIGATION Journal of the Institute of Navigation and Proceedings of the IEEE. Some of Federal Aviation Administration's most productive authors include Richard E. Lyon, Richard N. Walters, Stanislav I. Stoliarov, David E. Meyer, Jeffrey E. Evans, Joshua S. Rubinstein, D. W. Oplinger, Alvin M. Revzin, Ulf Ahlström and Michael Gorelik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.