Australian National Insect Collection
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
- Fossil Insects in Amber
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 211
- Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution 196
- Fossil Insects in Amber 134
- Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny 110
- Insect Science 332
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 212
- Top scholars
- Stephen L. CameronMichael F. WhitingDavid K. YeatesAdam ŚlipińskiJohn Francis LawrenceLaurence Alfred MoundKaren MeusemannMike Hodda
- Journals
- Zootaxa (220 papers)Systematic Entomology (49 papers)Austral Entomology (37 papers)ZooKeys (29 papers)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Australian National Insect Collection
821 papers receiving 16.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 9.6k
- Insect Science 5.2k
- Ecological Modeling 1.4k
- Paleontology 2.4k
- Genetics 5.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Australian National Insect Collection
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Australian National Insect Collection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Australian National Insect Collection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian National Insect Collection more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Australian National Insect Collection
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Australian National Insect Collection at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Australian National Insect Collection at the time of their publication.
About Australian National Insect Collection
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Australian National Insect Collection have published 912 papers, which have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 639 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 332 papers in Insect Science, 144 papers in Paleontology, 59 papers in Ecological Modeling and 264 papers in Genetics on the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (212 papers), Plant and animal studies (211 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (196 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (154 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (134 papers), Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (127 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (110 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (91 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (9.6k citations), Insect Science (5.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.4k citations), Paleontology (2.4k citations) and Genetics (5.4k citations). Authors at Australian National Insect Collection collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Systematic Entomology, Austral Entomology, ZooKeys and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. Some of Australian National Insect Collection's most productive authors include Stephen L. Cameron, Michael F. Whiting, David K. Yeates, Adam Ślipiński, John Francis Lawrence, Laurence Alfred Mound, Karen Meusemann, Mike Hodda, Robert W. Taylor and Hong Pang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.