Australian National Botanic Gardens
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 189
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 78
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 72
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 110
- Top scholars
- Rod PeakallPeter E. SmouseMichael Douglas CrispMike C. DoubleMichael D. JennionsRichard GriffithsKate J. OrrWilliam J. Foley
- Journals
- Annals of Botany (34 papers)Australian Journal of Botany (21 papers)Australian Systematic Botany (20 papers)Molecular Ecology (18 papers)Oecologia (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Australian National Botanic Gardens
879 papers receiving 52.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 19.6k
- Ecological Modeling 3.2k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 9.1k
- Ecology 16.2k
- Developmental Biology 1.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Australian National Botanic Gardens
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Australian National Botanic Gardens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Australian National Botanic Gardens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian National Botanic Gardens more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Australian National Botanic Gardens
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Australian National Botanic Gardens at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Australian National Botanic Gardens at the time of their publication.
About Australian National Botanic Gardens
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Australian National Botanic Gardens have published 934 papers, which have received a total of 54.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 400 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 152 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 46 papers in Ecological Modeling, 345 papers in Plant Science and 225 papers in Ecology on the topics of Plant and animal studies (189 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (110 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (78 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (72 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (70 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (61 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (56 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (19.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (3.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (9.1k citations), Ecology (16.2k citations) and Developmental Biology (1.3k citations). Authors at Australian National Botanic Gardens collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Botany, Australian Journal of Botany, Australian Systematic Botany, Molecular Ecology and Oecologia. Some of Australian National Botanic Gardens's most productive authors include Rod Peakall, Peter E. Smouse, Michael Douglas Crisp, Mike C. Double, Michael D. Jennions, Richard Griffiths, Kate J. Orr, William J. Foley, David M. Gordon and Lyn G. Cook.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.