Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 10%
Papers in
- Top scholars
- Cláudia Medina CoeliKenneth Rochel de CamargoVandack NobreKleberson de Oliveira PorpinoAntônio Luiz Pinho RibeiroMarcos Roberto de SousaFábio Morato de CastilhoMárcia Thereza Couto
- Journals
- Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (16 papers)Critical Care (10 papers)Jornal de Pediatria (10 papers)Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva (57 papers)Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira
377 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 335
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 71
- Occupational Therapy 158
- Health Information Management 125
- General Health Professions 638
Countries citing scholars working at Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira at the time of their publication.
About Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira have published 506 papers, which have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 32 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 19 papers in Occupational Therapy, 21 papers in Health Information Management and 104 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (63 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (28 papers), Public Health in Brazil (26 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (23 papers), Healthcare Regulation (21 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (17 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (15 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (335 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (71 citations), Occupational Therapy (158 citations), Health Information Management (125 citations) and General Health Professions (638 citations). Authors at Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira collaborate with scholars in Brazil, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Critical Care, Jornal de Pediatria, Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva and Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. Some of Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira's most productive authors include Cláudia Medina Coeli, Kenneth Rochel de Camargo, Vandack Nobre, Kleberson de Oliveira Porpino, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Marcos Roberto de Sousa, Fábio Morato de Castilho, Márcia Thereza Couto, Estela Regina Ferraz Bianchi and Ana Luiza d’Ávila Viana.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.