U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command
Impact in
-
- Photonic Crystals and Applications
- Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
- Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Aerospace and Aviation Technology 93
-
- Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies 114
- Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics 89
- Top scholars
- Jonathan P. DowlingMichael ScaloraCharles M. BowdenMark J. BloemerC. M. BowdenHenry O. EverittMohan SanghadasaJ. F. Perkins
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Physics (46 papers)Optics Communications (35 papers)Physical Review A (32 papers)Applied Physics Letters (31 papers)Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command
1.9k papers receiving 32.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 12.0k
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 257
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 4.6k
- Aerospace Engineering 4.9k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 10.6k
Countries citing scholars working at U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command at the time of their publication.
About U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command
In recent decades, authors affiliated with U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 573 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 532 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 56 papers in Instrumentation, 266 papers in Computational Mechanics and 676 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering on the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (222 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (155 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (114 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (96 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (93 papers), Laser Design and Applications (92 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (89 papers) and Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (89 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (12.0k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (257 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (4.6k citations), Aerospace Engineering (4.9k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (10.6k citations). Authors at U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command collaborate with scholars in United States, Italy and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Physics, Optics Communications, Physical Review A, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. Some of U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command's most productive authors include Jonathan P. Dowling, Michael Scalora, Charles M. Bowden, Mark J. Bloemer, C. M. Bowden, Henry O. Everitt, Mohan Sanghadasa, J. F. Perkins, Don A. Gregory and John L. Johnson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.