Office of Naval Research

67.3k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Office of Naval Research

2k papers receiving 67.1k citations

Peers

Office of Naval Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Modeling and Simulation 1.9k
  • Oceanography 3.4k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 3.4k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 2.4k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.8k
Replace U.S. National Science Foundation with:
U.S. National Science Foundation United States
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine United States
Science Applications International Corporation (United States) United States
United States Naval Academy United States
Northrop Grumman (United States) United States
Leidos (United States) United States
General Dynamics (United States) United States
Haverford College United States
Naval Surface Warfare Center United States
Bucknell University United States
Office of Naval Research relative to U.S. National Science Foundation United States U.S. National Science Foundation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
U.S. National Science Foundation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Office of Naval Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office of Naval Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office of Naval Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office of Naval Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Office of Naval Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office of Naval Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office of Naval Research at the time of their publication.

About Office of Naval Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office of Naval Research have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 67.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 147 papers in Oceanography, 25 papers in Metals and Alloys, 76 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 77 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 39 papers in Geology on the topics of scientometrics and bibliometrics research (68 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (60 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (45 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (40 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (40 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (34 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (33 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Modeling and Simulation (1.9k citations), Oceanography (3.4k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (3.4k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2.4k citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.8k citations). Authors at Office of Naval Research collaborate with scholars in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Eos, International Journal of Fatigue, Technological Forecasting and Social Change and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Office of Naval Research's most productive authors include Michael F. Shlesinger, Ronald Neil Kostoff, J. Klafter, Asuri K. Vasudevan, Philip Wolfe, Wallace Arden Smith, K. K. Chawla, David K. Ferry, Kuntimaddi Sadananda and Rabinder N. Madan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact