Office of Naval Research

73.6k citations
2.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Underwater Acoustics Research 119
    • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes 80

Office of Naval Research

2.2k papers receiving 68.6k citations

Peers

Office of Naval Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Oceanography 5.3k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 4.9k
  • Geophysics 4.7k
  • Modeling and Simulation 1.5k
  • Atmospheric Science 5.7k
Replace United States Department of Commerce with:
United States Department of Commerce United States
Naval Surface Warfare Center United States
Northrop Grumman (United States) United States
McCormick (United States) United States
Whitney Museum of American Art United States
University of the Sciences United States
General Dynamics (United States) United States
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics United States
United States Navy United States
Franklin Institute United States
Office of Naval Research relative to United States Department of Commerce United States United States Department of Commerce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
United States Department of Commerce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Office of Naval Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office of Naval Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office of Naval Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office of Naval Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Office of Naval Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office of Naval Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office of Naval Research at the time of their publication.

About Office of Naval Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office of Naval Research have published 2.5k papers, which have received a total of 73.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 263 papers in Oceanography, 68 papers in Geology, 27 papers in Metals and Alloys, 172 papers in Atmospheric Science and 220 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Underwater Acoustics Research (119 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (80 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (66 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (57 papers), Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (56 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (50 papers), Marine animal studies overview (50 papers) and Geological formations and processes (45 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (5.3k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (4.9k citations), Geophysics (4.7k citations), Modeling and Simulation (1.5k citations) and Atmospheric Science (5.7k citations). Authors at Office of Naval Research collaborate with scholars in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Nature, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Eos and Nuclear Physics A. Some of Office of Naval Research's most productive authors include Michael F. Shlesinger, Ronald N. Kostoff, Peter Vogt, J. Klafter, A.K. Vasudévan, Philip Wolfe, D. K. Ferry, W.A. Smith, K. Sadananda and G. Leonard Johnson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact