Alcoa (United States)

90.7k citations
2.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Metal Forming Simulation Techniques 332
    • Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties 217
    • Bauxite Residue and Utilization 116
    • Metallurgy and Material Forming 336
    • Fatigue and fracture mechanics 160

Alcoa (United States)

2.5k papers receiving 81.6k citations

Peers

Alcoa (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Mechanical Engineering 39.8k
  • Mechanics of Materials 23.9k
  • Ceramics and Composites 4.0k
  • Materials Chemistry 31.7k
  • Metals and Alloys 1.6k
Replace GE Global Research (United States) with:
GE Global Research (United States) United States
National Energy Technology Laboratory United States
Hydro-Québec Canada
Cabot (United States) United States
McCormick (United States) United States
United States Department of the Interior United States
Lockheed Martin (Canada) Canada
Linde (United States) United States
United States Air Force United States
Rogers (United States) United States
Alcoa (United States) relative to GE Global Research (United States) United States GE Global Research (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
GE Global Research (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Alcoa (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Alcoa (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Alcoa (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alcoa (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Alcoa (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Alcoa (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Alcoa (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Alcoa (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Alcoa (United States) have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 90.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Mechanical Engineering, 741 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 83 papers in General Materials Science, 146 papers in Ceramics and Composites and 421 papers in Aerospace Engineering on the topics of Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (369 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (336 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (332 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (235 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (217 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (160 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (131 papers) and Bauxite Residue and Utilization (116 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Mechanical Engineering (39.8k citations), Mechanics of Materials (23.9k citations), Ceramics and Composites (4.0k citations), Materials Chemistry (31.7k citations) and Metals and Alloys (1.6k citations). Authors at Alcoa (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, JOM, International Journal of Plasticity, Metallurgical Transactions A and Journal of the American Ceramic Society. Some of Alcoa (United States)'s most productive authors include Philip H. Ramsey, Daniel S. Wilks, F. Barlat, Tapan K. Gupta, D.W. Clarke, C. Mohtadi, Jeong Whan Yoon, Ronald Wetzel, Brian R. Strohmeier and Oana Cazacu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact