Active Medicine (United Kingdom)
Impact in
-
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
-
- Bone health and osteoporosis research
Papers in
-
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications 39
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications 26
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 17
-
- Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies 27
- Top scholars
- Felix Y. FengJoseph R. EvansArul M. ChinnaiyanStanley J. GoldsmithMatthew I. MilowskyDavid M. NanusShankar VallabhajosulaNeil H. Bander
- Journals
- Nuclear Medicine Communications (56 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (7 papers)Journal of neurosurgery (7 papers)Clinical Nuclear Medicine (57 papers)Endocrine Related Cancer (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Active Medicine (United Kingdom)
361 papers receiving 10.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.4k
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 727
- Cancer Research 1.1k
- Oncology 1.8k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.0k
Countries citing scholars working at Active Medicine (United Kingdom)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Active Medicine (United Kingdom). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Active Medicine (United Kingdom) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Active Medicine (United Kingdom) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Active Medicine (United Kingdom)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Active Medicine (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Active Medicine (United Kingdom) at the time of their publication.
About Active Medicine (United Kingdom)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Active Medicine (United Kingdom) have published 419 papers, which have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 87 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 92 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 40 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 64 papers in Oncology and 14 papers in Nephrology on the topics of Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (39 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (27 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (26 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (22 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (17 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (14 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (14 papers) and Bone health and treatments (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.4k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (727 citations), Cancer Research (1.1k citations), Oncology (1.8k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.0k citations). Authors at Active Medicine (United Kingdom) collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Nuclear Medicine Communications, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of neurosurgery, Clinical Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Related Cancer. Some of Active Medicine (United Kingdom)'s most productive authors include Felix Y. Feng, Joseph R. Evans, Arul M. Chinnaiyan, Stanley J. Goldsmith, Matthew I. Milowsky, David M. Nanus, Shankar Vallabhajosula, Neil H. Bander, Lale Kostakoğlu and Jerry R. Greenfield.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.