The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook.
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w98347488 →Countries where authors are citing The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook.
This map shows the geographic impact of The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook.
This network shows the impact of The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook..
About The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook.
This paper, published in 1986, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Leslie S. Greenberg and William M. Pinsof covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Social Psychology (555 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Applied Psychology (97 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (91 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w98347488.