Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
Impact in
- Authors
- John A. Bargh
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w96562971 →Countries where authors are citing Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
This map shows the geographic impact of Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
This network shows the impact of Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition..
About Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
This paper, published in 1989, received 790 indexed citations . Written by John A. Bargh. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (316 citations), Social Psychology (311 citations), Sociology and Political Science (286 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (176 citations) and Applied Psychology (141 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w96562971.