Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care.
Impact in
- Safety Research 421
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9636934 →Countries where authors are citing Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care.
This map shows the geographic impact of Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care.
This network shows the impact of Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care..
About Foster youth transitions to adulthood: a longitudinal view of youth leaving care.
This paper, published in 2002, received 528 indexed citations . Written by Mark E. Courtney, Irving Piliavin and Andrew Grogan‐Kaylor covering the research area of General Health Professions, Safety Research and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety Research (421 citations), Sociology and Political Science (235 citations), Clinical Psychology (229 citations), General Health Professions (196 citations) and Demography (51 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9636934.