Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language
Impact in
- Software 244
Classified as
- Authors
- Lars Ole AndersenPeter Lee
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w91782004 →Countries where authors are citing Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language
This map shows the geographic impact of Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language
This network shows the impact of Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language.
About Program Analysis and Specialization for the C Programming Language
This paper, published in 2005, received 577 indexed citations . Written by Lars Ole Andersen and Peter Lee covering the research area of Information Systems and Software. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (362 citations), Software (244 citations), Hardware and Architecture (230 citations), Information Systems (208 citations) and Signal Processing (174 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w91782004.