Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide

1.3k indexed citations
published 2000

Impact in

Authors
David Vose
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w91068155 →

Countries where authors are citing Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide.

About Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide

This paper, published in 2000, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by David Vose. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Food Science (264 citations), Biotechnology (174 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (148 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (147 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (127 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w91068155.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact