Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
Impact in
- Education 1.6k
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8869646 →Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
This network shows the impact of Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies.
About Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies
This paper, published in 2009, received 2.2k indexed citations . Written by Barbara Means, Yukie Toyama, Robert F. Murphy and Marianne Bakia covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (1.6k citations), Computer Science Applications (578 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (442 citations), Information Systems (298 citations) and Media Technology (186 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8869646.