Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations

855 indexed citations
published 1982
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w87564102 →

Countries where authors are citing Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations.

About Generalized Solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi Equations

This paper, published in 1982, received 855 indexed citations . Written by Pierre‐Louis Lions covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Control and Systems Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (395 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (350 citations), Mathematical Physics (150 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (144 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (129 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w87564102.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact