Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Marc Madou
- Journal
- CRC Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8745456 →Countries where authors are citing Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization
This map shows the geographic impact of Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization
This network shows the impact of Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization.
About Fundamentals of microfabrication : the science of miniaturization
This paper, published in 2002, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Marc Madou covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (599 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (551 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (198 citations), Materials Chemistry (198 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (145 citations). Published in CRC Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8745456.