Psychoticism as a dimension of personality
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- H. J. EysenckSybil B. G. Eysenck
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w87295359 →Countries where authors are citing Psychoticism as a dimension of personality
This map shows the geographic impact of Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psychoticism as a dimension of personality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoticism as a dimension of personality more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Psychoticism as a dimension of personality
This network shows the impact of Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psychoticism as a dimension of personality.
About Psychoticism as a dimension of personality
This paper, published in 1976, received 882 indexed citations . Written by H. J. Eysenck and Sybil B. G. Eysenck covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (407 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (257 citations), Social Psychology (250 citations), Sociology and Political Science (146 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w87295359.