Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85367677 →Countries where authors are citing Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects
This map shows the geographic impact of Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects
This network shows the impact of Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects.
About Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects
This paper, published in 2000, received 585 indexed citations . Written by Douglas C. Schmidt, Michael Stal, Hans Rohnert and Frank Buschmann covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (344 citations), Information Systems (308 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (299 citations), Hardware and Architecture (133 citations) and Software (98 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85367677.