The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
Impact in
- Plant Science 806
- Cell Biology 364
Classified as
- Authors
- Robert CookKenneth F. Baker
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83044663 →Countries where authors are citing The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
This map shows the geographic impact of The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
This network shows the impact of The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens.
About The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens
This paper, published in 1983, received 896 indexed citations . Written by Robert Cook and Kenneth F. Baker covering the research area of Plant Science and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (806 citations), Cell Biology (364 citations), Molecular Biology (94 citations), Soil Science (93 citations) and Insect Science (56 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83044663.