Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

473 indexed citations
published 1987
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w80768668 →

Countries where authors are citing Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Group Processes and Intergroup Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Group Processes and Intergroup Relations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.

About Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

This paper, published in 1987, received 473 indexed citations . Written by Clyde Hendrick. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (330 citations), Social Psychology (277 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations) and Gender Studies (56 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w80768668.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact