Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
Impact in
- Education 1.2k
- Communication 665
- Authors
- Étienne WengerWilliam M. Snyder
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79795754 →Countries where authors are citing Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
This map shows the geographic impact of Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
This network shows the impact of Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge.
About Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
This paper, published in 2002, received 3.4k indexed citations . Written by Étienne Wenger and William M. Snyder. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (1.2k citations), Communication (665 citations), Sociology and Political Science (560 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (543 citations) and Strategy and Management (409 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79795754.