Reassessing the impact of finance on growth

364 indexed citations
published 2012
Journal
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7350653 →

Countries where authors are citing Reassessing the impact of finance on growth

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reassessing the impact of finance on growth. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reassessing the impact of finance on growth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reassessing the impact of finance on growth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Reassessing the impact of finance on growth

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Reassessing the impact of finance on growth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reassessing the impact of finance on growth.

About Reassessing the impact of finance on growth

This paper, published in 2012, received 364 indexed citations . Written by Stephen G. Cecchetti and Enisse Kharroubi covering the research area of Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (222 citations), Finance (212 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (122 citations), Accounting (108 citations) and Information Systems (91 citations). Published in RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7350653.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact