Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification.
Impact in
- Physiology 119
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w73333682 →Countries where authors are citing Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification.
This map shows the geographic impact of Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification.
This network shows the impact of Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification..
About Secretion of human growth hormone: physiologic and experimental modification.
This paper, published in 1963, received 327 indexed citations . Written by Jesse Roth, S Glick, Rosalyn S. Yalow and Solomon A. Berson covering the research area of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (197 citations), Physiology (119 citations), Molecular Biology (50 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (47 citations) and Cell Biology (40 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w73333682.