Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight.
Impact in
- Epidemiology 283
Classified as
- Authors
- Clare GilbertAllen Foster
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w72851997 →Countries where authors are citing Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight.
This map shows the geographic impact of Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight.
This network shows the impact of Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight..
About Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight.
This paper, published in 2001, received 878 indexed citations . Written by Clare Gilbert and Allen Foster covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (359 citations), Epidemiology (283 citations), Ophthalmology (232 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (80 citations) and Molecular Biology (62 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w72851997.