Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nuclear Fusion
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7189048 →Countries where authors are citing Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research
This map shows the geographic impact of Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research
This network shows the impact of Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research.
About Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research
This paper, published in 1987, received 2.8k indexed citations . Written by S. M. Gibson, Tadashi Sekiguchi, K. Lackner, S. E. Bodner and R. Hancox covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.6k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (774 citations), Aerospace Engineering (473 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (465 citations). Published in Nuclear Fusion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7189048.