The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w71465771 →Countries where authors are citing The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma.
This map shows the geographic impact of The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma.
This network shows the impact of The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma..
About The LNCaP cell line--a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma.
This paper, published in 1980, received 450 indexed citations . Written by Julius S. Horoszewicz, Susan S. Leong, T. Ming Chu, Zew Wajsman, Mendel Friedman, Lawrence D. Papsidero, Uk-Il Kim, Lixun Chai, Savita Arya and A A Sandberg covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (209 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (198 citations), Oncology (86 citations), Genetics (70 citations) and Cancer Research (62 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w71465771.