SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS.
Impact in
- Epidemiology 425
Classified as
- Authors
- W.T. Mustard
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w70975367 →Countries where authors are citing SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS.
This map shows the geographic impact of SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS.
This network shows the impact of SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS..
About SUCCESSFUL TWO-STAGE CORRECTION OF TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT VESSELS.
This paper, published in 1964, received 497 indexed citations . Written by W.T. Mustard covering the research area of Aerospace Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (425 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (274 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (271 citations), Surgery (213 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (30 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w70975367.