World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets
Impact in
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w69711642 →Countries where authors are citing World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets
This map shows the geographic impact of World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets
This network shows the impact of World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets.
About World development report 2002 - building institutions for markets
This paper, published in 2001, received 504 indexed citations . Written by Roumeen Islam, Alexander Dyck, Arup Banerji, Simeon Djankov, Caralee McLiesh, Asli Demirgüç‐Kunt, Russell Pittman, Robert Cull and Aart Kraay. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (186 citations), Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Political Science and International Relations (109 citations), Strategy and Management (83 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (72 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w69711642.