Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community

979 indexed citations
published 1998
Journal
Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w69329024 →

Countries where authors are citing Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community.

About Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community

This paper, published in 1998, received 979 indexed citations . Written by Dávid Barton and Mary Hamilton covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (520 citations), Education (488 citations), Sociology and Political Science (225 citations), Linguistics and Language (216 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (133 citations). Published in Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w69329024.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact