Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach
Impact in
- Software 571
Classified as
- Authors
- Mark UttingBruno Legeard
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68401679 →Countries where authors are citing Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach
This map shows the geographic impact of Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach
This network shows the impact of Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach.
About Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach
This paper, published in 2006, received 669 indexed citations . Written by Mark Utting and Bruno Legeard covering the research area of Software, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Software (571 citations), Information Systems (209 citations), Artificial Intelligence (197 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (162 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (132 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68401679.