A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses.
Impact in
- Plant Science 219
- Insect Science 190
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w68181817 →Countries where authors are citing A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses.
This map shows the geographic impact of A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses.
This network shows the impact of A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses..
About A conspectus of aphids as vectors of plant viruses.
This paper, published in 1962, received 249 indexed citations . Written by John Kennedy, M. F. Day and V. F. Eastop covering the research area of Plant Science and Insect Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (219 citations), Insect Science (190 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (32 citations), Molecular Biology (23 citations) and Endocrinology (11 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w68181817.